Need for Guidelines to Enhance Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education in Tanzania Artificial Intelligence; Ethical Guidelines; Higher Education.

Main Article Content

Julius Tunsaje Tweve

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is progressing at an astonishing pace, raising profound ethical concerns
regarding its use, ownership, accountability, and long-term implications for quality education. This
study explores the need for guidelines to inform and maintain ethical use of artificial intelligence in
higher education in Tanzania. The study was guided by three objectives that aimed to: examine
awareness of the use of artificial intelligence, identify ethical challenges arising from its use, and assess
the need to establish guidelines for the ethical use of artificial intelligence in higher education in
Tanzania. The study was conducted at fully fledged universities, where quality assurance practitioners
were involved in completing a questionnaire, and the Deputy Vice-Chancellors (responsible for
Academic Affairs) participated in interviews. Research findings show that the majority of respondents
are aware of the use of artificial intelligence in universities. Ethical challenges identified are the
existence of biases, lack of integrity, discrimination among users, lack of honesty, violation of
confidentiality, reduced transparency, violation of privacy, reduced accountability, and violation of
human dignity and rights. The study recommends universities to implement innovative mechanisms to
ensure ethical use of artificial intelligence, including capacity-building through training. 

Issue Section: Business Education

Article Details

References

Almufareh, M. F., Tehsin, S., Humayun, M., & Kausar, S. (2023). Intellectual disability and technology: An artificial intelligence perspective and framework. Journal of Disability Research, 2(4), 58–70.

Ams, S. (2023). Blurred lines: The convergence of military and civilian uses of AI & data use and its impact on liberal democracy. International Politics, 60(4), 879–896.

Anshari, M., Almunawar, M. N., Masri, M., & Hrdy, M. (2021). Financial technology with AI- enabled and ethical challenges. Society, 58(3), 189.

Astromskė, K., Peičius, E., & Astromskis, P. (2021). Ethical and legal challenges of informed consent applying artificial intelligence in medical diagnostic consultations. AI & Society, 36, 509–520.

Bao, Y., Hilary, G., & Ke, B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and fraud detection. In V. Babich, J. Birge, & G. Hilary (Eds.),

Brandsen, S., Chandrasekhar, T., Franz, L., Grapel, J., Dawson, G., & Carlson, D. (2024). Prevalence of bias against neuro-divergence-related terms in artificial intelligence language models. Autism Research, 17(2), 234–248.

Casillas, J. (2024). Bias and discrimination in machine decision-making systems. Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, 13-38. 150 The White House. (2022).

Cohen, I. G., & Slottje, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the law of informed consent. In

Research handbook on health, AI and the Law (pp. 167-182). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Copeland, B. J. (2024, November 27). Artificial intelligence. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/technology/artificialintelligence; see also: UK Information

Deloitte (2024). How generative AI is transforming the semiconductor industry. Deloitte. Retrievedfrom

https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/technology-media- telecommunications/tmt-gen-ai-semiconductor-industry-pov.pdf

Fukuda ‐ Parr, S., & Gibbons, E. (2021). Emerging consensus on ‘ethical AI’: Human rights critique of stakeholder guidelines. Irwin Press, London.

Garcia, D. (2024). Algorithms and Decision-Making in Military Artificial Intelligence. Global Society, 38(1), 24-33. 153 Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2022).

Ghaharian, K., Binesh, F., Soligo, M., Golab, L., & Abarbanel, B. (2024). AI ethics in a controversial industry: The case of gambling and its ethical paradox. AI and Ethics, 1-17.

Greenhouse, S. (2024, January 7). Artificial intelligence surveillance of workers raises ethical concerns. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/07/artificial- intelligence-surveillance-workers.

Hussein, B., Mbembati, H., & Tinabo, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence services at academic libraries in Tanzania: Awareness, adoption and prospects. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal, 18(2), 19–35, ISSN: 0856-1818

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2023). ISO/IEC 5338:2023 - Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Life cycle processes. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/81118.html;

Iserson, K. V. (2024). Informed consent for artificial intelligence in emergency medicine: A practical guide. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 76, 225-230.

Iwan, D. (2021). The use of artificial intelligence in armed conflicts–implications for state responsibility. In Regulating Artificial Intelligence in Industry (pp. 176-189).

Kassile T. and Tweve J. (2023), The Role of Quality Assurance in Enhancing Online Teaching and Learning at Higher Education. Presented at African Quality Assurance Conference, organizsed by AfriQAN and hosted by Tanzania Commission for Universities (TCU) held at Serena Hotel in Dar es Salaam, 28th – 30th November 2023. Theme: Potentials of Quality Assurance in Advancing Excellence in Higher in Digital Era.

Karpa, D., Klarl, T., & Rochlitz, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence, surveillance, and big data. In Diginomics Research Perspectives: The Role of Digitalization in Business and Society (pp. 145-172). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

King, A. (2024). Digital targeting: Artificial intelligence, data, and military intelligence. Journal of Global Security Studies, 9(2), ogae009. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogae009.

Kriebitz, A., & Lütge, C. (2020). Artificial intelligence and human rights: A business ethical assessment. Business and Human Rights Journal, 5(1), 84-104.

Kriebitz, A., Corrigan C., & Boch, A. (2024), Munich Convention on Artificial Intelligence, Data and Human Rights (Draft for Public Consultation). Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384678262_Munich_Convention_on_Artificial_Intelligence_Data_and_Human_Rights_Draft_for_Public_ Consultation

Lin, P., & Van Brummelen, J. (2021). Engaging teachers to co-design integrated AI curricula for K-12 classrooms. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12.

Ma, Y., Wang, Z., Yang, H., & Yang, L. (2020). Artificial intelligence applications in the development of autonomous vehicles: A survey. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 7(2), 315-329.

Maghsudi, S., Lan, A., Xu, J., & van Der Schaar, M. (2021). Personalized education in the artificial intelligence era: what to expect next. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 38(3), 37-50.

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [MoEST] (2025), National Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence in Education.

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1

NIST. (2024). Artificial intelligence risk management framework: Generative artificial intelligence profile (NIST AI-600-1). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI-RMF.600-1

Peters, U. (2022). Algorithmic political bias in artificial intelligence systems. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 25.

Rashid, A. B., Kausik, A. K., Al Hassan Sunny, A., & Bappy, M. H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the military: An overview of the capabilities, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2023(1), 8676366.

Rosli, W. R. W. (2025). Waging warfare against states: the deployment of artificial intelligence in cyber espionage. AI and Ethics, 1-7.

Routledge. De Freitas, J., Uğuralp, A. K., Oğuz‐Uğuralp, Z., & Puntoni, S. (2024). Chatbots and mental health: Insights into the safety of generative AI. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 34(3), 481-491.

Sanusi, I. T. (2021). Intercontinental evidence on learners’ differentials in sense-making of machine learning in schools. Proceedings of the 21st Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research, 1–2.

Temitayo Sanusi, I. (2021). Teaching Machine Learning in K-12 Education. Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, 395–397.

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/recommendation-ethics-artificial-intelligence.

UNGA. (2024). Seizing the Opportunities of Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence Systems for Sustainable Development[A/78/L.49] Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/4040897

Venkit, P. N., & Wilson, S. (2021). Identification of bias against people with disabilities in sentiment analysis and toxicity detection models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13259. 154 See: UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation

Wall, P. J., Saxena, D., & Brown, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the Global South (AI4D): Potential and risks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.10093.

Yu, S., & Carroll, F. (2022). Implications of AI in national security: understanding the security issues and ethical challenges. In Artificial Intelligence in Cyber Security: Impact and Implications: Security Challenges, Technical and Ethical Issues, Forensic Investigative Challenges (pp. 157-175). Cham: Springer International Publishing.