MAINSTREAMING STRATEGIES AND GENDER EQUALITY IN DODOMA MUNICIPALITY AND MPWAPWA DISTRICT COUNCIL, TANZANIA

Authors

  • Mujwahuzi L S CBE
  • Sikira A N
  • Lyimo-Macha J G

Keywords:

Levels of Gender Equality, Gender Mainstreaming Strategies and Urban and Rural areas.

Abstract

Gender equality within Local Government Authorities (LGAs) is an important aspect for spearheading sustainable development in any country. Gender Mainstreaming Strategies (GMSs) are set to achieve Gender equality. Despite various GMSs, gender gaps and their negative impacts to sustainable development persist in Tanzania. This can be attributed to various challenges in the course of implementing GMSs. However, in Tanzania, few studies have uncovered levels of gender equality as a result of GM in LGAs. Likewise, the data for challenges which may be impeding the implementation of various GMSs are scarce. Hence, this paper is about (i) assessing some implemented GMSs (ii) determining challenges encountered in mainstreaming gender, (iii) examining the levels of gender equality achieved in the LGAs as a result of GMSs and (iv) determining gender equality levels of men and women officials in urban and rural areas. A cross-sectional research design was employed using 358 respondents. Levels of gender equality achieved were measured by using a Composite Gender Equality Index (CGEI). The Index was adopted from the European Union Gender Equality Index (GEI) whose measure of Gender Equality (GE) ranges from 1 to 100. The Man Whitney U test was used to test the hypothesis that (i) gender equality levels are the same between male and female officials and also between Dodoma Municipality and Mpwapwa District officials.  The results showed that most of GMSs were not well implemented; therefore LGAs planners should make sure that the implementation of existing GMSs is ensured according to government priorities and frameworks. Since, the overall gender equality level was found to be low (34.7% and 24.6% for male and female respectively); hence more gender mainstreaming strategies have to be implemented at the LGA level so as to spearhead sustainable development. Moreover, the equality level was generally found to be the same for both male and female, urban and rural officials, then, policy planners and LGAs gender sensitising bodies such as NGOs, media and CBOs were urged toprovide GM measures targeting both MDC and DMC equally. Since large number of men reported high level of gender equality while the overall level of gender equality was low, then it is recommended that men should be used by policy makers as agents for change towards gender equality as they occupy many decision making positions in LGAs as compared to women.

References

Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 278pp.

Aggrest, A. (2002). Categorical Data Analysis (2nd Edition). John Wiley and Sons Inc., New Jersey. 710pp.

Al-Ahmadi, Hanan (2011). "Challenges facing women leaders in Saudi Arabia." Human Resource Development International Journal, 14 (2): 149-166.

African Peer Reform Mechanism (2010). Second Report on the Implementation of South Africa's Aprm Programme of Action. The New Partnership for Africa’s Development. 24pp.

Bailey, C. J., Mynett, K. J. and Page, T. (1994). Importance of the intestine as a site of metforminâ€stimulated glucose utilization. British Journal of Pharmacology, 112(2): 671-675.

Barton, C. and Nazombei, E. (2000). Women’s Labour and Economic Globalization: A Participatory Workshop Created by Alternative Women in Development (Alt-WID), Gender and Development, 8(1): 132-135.

Boyd, D. W. (1981). "Speculations concerning the range of Mahler’s measure." Canad. Math. Bull, 24(4): 453-469.

Casley, D. J. and Kumar, K. (1998). The collection, Analysis and use of Monitoring and Evaluation of Data. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Washington, D.C. 160pp.

Congress of Local and Regional Authority (2010). Achieving sustainable gender equality in local and regional .political life. [https://wcd.coe.i nt/View Doc .jsp? p=&id= 1582477 &Site=Congress direct = true] site visited on 29/04/2016.

Cottrell, B. and Jane, L. P. T. (2006). "Academic-community collaboration, gender research, and development: Pitfalls and possibilities." Development in Practice, 16 (1) : 15-26.

Council of European Union (2009). Council Conclusions on Gender equality: strengthening growth and employment - input to the post-2010 Lisbon Strategy, Brussels. 1pp.

Daly, M. F. (2005). Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice’, Social Politics International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12 (3): 433 -450pp.

Davidson, M. J. and Burke, R. J. (2011). Women in Management Worldwide (Vol. 2). Aldershot: Gower.

Evertzen, A. (2010). VNG international Committed to Strengthening Democratic Local Government Worldwide. VNG International, The Hague, the Netherlands. 31pp.

FAO (2014). Gender Inequalities in Rural Employment in Tanzania Mainland. An Overview, Tanzania Mainland country Profile. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome. 54pp.

Ferrant, G. (2009). A New Way to Measure Gender Inequalities in Developing Countries: The Gender Inequalities Index (GII), JEL classification, 16: O11, O57, C43.

Isrel, D. (2013). Determining Sample Size. University of Frolida, University of Florida, IFAS Extension. PEOD6. 5pp.

Kombo, I. and Minungu, L. (2012). Gender imbalances in the Leadership of Local Government Authorities in Tanzania. The case of Dodoma Municipality, African Journal of Social Sciences 3(2): 116-123.

Mann, C. J. (2003). Observational research methods research design II: cohort, cross sectional, and case studies. Emergency Medical Journal 20: 54-60.

Rangnekar, S. (1998). “The Role of Women in Small- Holder Rainfed and Mixed Farming in Indiaâ€. [http://www.husdyr.kvl.dk/htm/php/tune98/inde x2.htm] site visited on 13/09/2015.

Razavi, S. and Carol, M. (1995). From WID to GAD: Conceptual shifts in the women and development discourse. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva. Vol. 1.

Tanzania Gender Networking Programme (2006). Gender Mainstreaming in Development Policies and Programmes: Presentation made during policy dialogue seminar at ESRF. Dar es Salaam.10-13pp.

True, J. and Mintrom, M. (2001). ‘Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The case of Gender Mainstreaming. International Studies Quarterly, 45: 27-57.

True, J. (2003). “Mainstreaming Gender in Global Public Policy.†International Feminist Journal of Politics 5: 368–396.

UN (1997). Report of the Economic and Social Council for 1997. [http://ww w.un.org/ documents/ga/docs/52/plenary/a52-3.htm] site visited on 28/04/2016.

URT (1994). Ministry of land, Housing and Urban development. Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry into Land Matters, Vol.1, Land Policy and Land Tenure Structure published in cooperation with the Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, Upsala, Sweden. 145pp.

URT (2012). Tanzania Population Census, 2012 Population and Housing Census. Population Distribution by Administrative areas, National Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance. Dar es Salaam. 67pp.

Walby, S. F. (2005). Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, States and Society, 12(3): 321-342.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-07

How to Cite

S, M. L., N, S. A., & G, L.-M. J. (2019). MAINSTREAMING STRATEGIES AND GENDER EQUALITY IN DODOMA MUNICIPALITY AND MPWAPWA DISTRICT COUNCIL, TANZANIA. Business Education Journal, 5(1). Retrieved from http://bej.cbe.ac.tz/index.php/bej/article/view/167

Issue

Section

Social Sciences